Absolutely right! This has become more apparent as we watch Copenhagen and the demands of the 3rd world countries for the developing world to fork over billions of dollars in reparations. I would also add that the agenda also encompasses the undermining of national sovereignty as our leaders sign us over to binding international agreements.
Natural disasters aside, since when has the richer countries helping out poorer countries been such a bad idea?
I agree that using global warming as some flimsy reason behind why we should be helping out is bad but if theres anything positive to be gained out of the BIG LIE then surely the top 5% of the planet giving up some of its 95% of the wealth cant be bad.
I'm not sure what to make from this. I guess provided it doesn't cause a country's economy to collapse then paying out to less prosperous countries isn't a bad thing regardless of whether it is or isn't based on a real thing. This particular blog does smell a little bit like a conspiracey theory though, I'm not sure that there is a massive group secretly trying to fabricate the idea of global warming just to redistribute global wealth.
This blog has been created as a climate change skeptic repository. In this blog is a collection of newspaper columns and scientific papers all demonstrating the non consensus of the supposed man induced climate change. There is no doubt that the earth has experienced some global warming in the last 25 years but the jury is still out as to why and beyond that there is no consensus in the SCIENTIFIC COMMUNITY.
Abstract Listing
As follows is a listing of Abrstracts written by 'climotoligists'. They are summerized in to different catigories.
3 comments:
Absolutely right! This has become more apparent as we watch Copenhagen and the demands of the 3rd world countries for the developing world to fork over billions of dollars in reparations. I would also add that the agenda also encompasses the undermining of national sovereignty as our leaders sign us over to binding international agreements.
Is that really such a bad thing!
Natural disasters aside, since when has the richer countries helping out poorer countries been such a bad idea?
I agree that using global warming as some flimsy reason behind why we should be helping out is bad but if theres anything positive to be gained out of the BIG LIE then surely the top 5% of the planet giving up some of its 95% of the wealth cant be bad.
I'm not sure what to make from this. I guess provided it doesn't cause a country's economy to collapse then paying out to less prosperous countries isn't a bad thing regardless of whether it is or isn't based on a real thing.
This particular blog does smell a little bit like a conspiracey theory though, I'm not sure that there is a massive group secretly trying to fabricate the idea of global warming just to redistribute global wealth.
Post a Comment